anomy-list

Re: Request for comments: sanitizer.procmail sample rule

From: Mark Janssen (125634@xyz.molar.is)
Date: Thu 13 May 2004 - 21:51:56 GMT

  • Next message: 125711@xyz.molar.is: "How many people are blocking .xml files as attachments?"

    Bjarni R. Einarsson wrote:

    >Hi all,
    >
    >I've created a procmail rule which illustrates how to invoke
    >the Sanitizer and then add headers to the message based on the
    >results of the scanning process (e.g. add a header when a
    >virus is found).
    >
    >While I was at it I also implemented basic quarantine
    >functionality, just to make debugging things a little bit
    >easier. :-)
    >
    >I'm looking for people interested in testing it and giving me
    >feedback. The ruleset is here:
    >
    > http://mailtools.anomy.net/dist/sanitizer.procmail
    >
    >I'd also like to solicit comments from you on what other
    >goodies it would be nice to have in a standard procmail
    >rule-set. Good ideas would get added to the file (possibly
    >commented out by default) and this file will be included (in
    >the contrib/ directory) with future releases of the sanitizer.
    >
    >So... comments, anyone?
    >
    >
    >
    It's a nice idea.
    However, I'd like to see a sanitizer-side header modification :).

    Mark Janssen
    http://www.givemehelp.co.uk/



    hosted by molar.is