Re: Content ID vs. filename?

From: Rick Johnson (
Date: Thu 30 Oct 2003 - 03:18:04 GMT

I thought the issue sounded framiliar - I didn't keep the msg. Sorry for
the dupe.


Marvin Herbold wrote:
> I posted the exact same problem a week or two ago - nobody had a
> solution. The result was that I had to allow .com files through or all
> inline images would be dropped. :-(
> Marvin
> Rick Johnson wrote:
>> I was experimenting with a new feature of Mozilla Thunderbird today -
>> the ability to paste inline screenshots (as JPEG attachments).
>> When I sent a message with a screen shot embedded, the recipient on
>> the other size said that Sanitizer had pulled the attachment. I
>> thought this was a bit odd, so I looked at my message source. Here's a
>> bit of the mime header:
>> Content-Type: image/jpeg;
>> name="moz-screenshot.jpg"
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
>> Content-ID: <>
>> Content-Disposition: inline;
>> filename="moz-screenshot.jpg"
>> The Sanitizer log stated that the file had been quarantined with the
>> name of
>> Which is telling me that Anomy picked up the Content-ID instead of the
>> name or filename fields.
>> Is there a setting I can change? Is Thunderbird setting the wrong
>> mime-headers for this message, or is Anomy looking in the wrong place?
>> Thanks,
>> -Rick

Rick Johnson, RHCE #807302311706007 -
Linux/Network Administrator - Medata, Inc. (from home)
PGP Public Key:

hosted by