Re: Content ID vs. filename?

From: Marvin Herbold (
Date: Wed 29 Oct 2003 - 18:48:01 GMT

  • Next message: Systems Administrator: "Re: Content ID vs. filename?"

    I posted the exact same problem a week or two ago - nobody had a
    solution. The result was that I had to allow .com files through or all
    inline images would be dropped. :-(


    Rick Johnson wrote:

    >I was experimenting with a new feature of Mozilla Thunderbird today - the
    >ability to paste inline screenshots (as JPEG attachments).
    >When I sent a message with a screen shot embedded, the recipient on the
    >other size said that Sanitizer had pulled the attachment. I thought this was
    >a bit odd, so I looked at my message source. Here's a bit of the mime header:
    >Content-Type: image/jpeg;
    > name="moz-screenshot.jpg"
    >Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
    >Content-ID: <>
    >Content-Disposition: inline;
    > filename="moz-screenshot.jpg"
    >The Sanitizer log stated that the file had been quarantined with the name of
    >Which is telling me that Anomy picked up the Content-ID instead of the name
    >or filename fields.
    >Is there a setting I can change? Is Thunderbird setting the wrong
    >mime-headers for this message, or is Anomy looking in the wrong place?

    Marvin Herbold

    hosted by