> I don't know how other admins feel, but speaking for myself, I'd be
> quite happy to see Anomy just defang
> Content-type: message/partial;
> This should be a fairly simple fix. In the whole time I've been using
> Anomy I can count on the fingers of a couple of hands the number of
> times I've needed to fish a legitimate executable out of quarrantine for
> someone; I'd be awfully surprised if legitimate cases of fragmented
> executables start keeping me busy.
This sounds like a good solution. I prefer doing some manual work than
allowing a single EXE pass a mailfilter... Does anybody know a mail client
that actually sends "message/partial" messages?
> If the fragment header is defanged, then on receipt it should simply
> fail reassembly.
Anybody care to take a look into code? I'm not much of a perl programmer