Last night I just upgraded to 1.48 from a much older version. I got
one complaint from a user who got a huge piece of sanitizer log "in-
line" -- visually it looks like it's inside a box. This is a heavily
forwarded E-mail, and it looks like it was originally edited in Word
as HTML. It is a prodigious amount of defanging.
This is one of those users who insists he "must" ("as a matter of
record") print and file every E-mail on certain matters, and he is
not amused at having all this stuff in his E-mail.
I'm not amused at the thought of turning off feat_html. (I did read
about the uuencode issue. We should have feat_uuencode on, I don't
think that's the problem. [It's kind of hard for me to capture his
message raw, so I don't really know how the original message was
coded.])
It seems to me I recall reading in the change log (or somewhere) that
there's now some finer grain control over HTML defanging. Is there
somewhere I can read up on this?
I don't know how other people feel, but as a workaday system
administrator, I'm more thankful for Anomy than just about any other
tool I can think of. It means the difference between being able to
get my work done and being in a panic to update virus definitions
everywhere every time some new critter comes out. Which these days
is *OFTEN*. Anomy is doing more to make my life sane than any other
anti-malware weapon I've got. So, I really don't want my users to be
mad at it ...
Any advice on how to tone down the defanging of Microsoft {X,HT}ML
crapola?
--- #include <disclaimer.h> Jim Rosenberg Ross Mould E-mail: 34529@xyz.molar.is